One of the two “moderate conservative” hosts of a local talk radio program admitted yesterday that he changed his mind about liberal media bias. That was quite an admission, because for years he defended the media and said that any bias was perceived by the reader and not perpetrated by those in the media.
While the other host of the program tried to claim credit for the conversion, he admitted that the blatant actions of two people changed his mind: Charles Gibson and Katie Couric. I didn’t get to hear which actions. I assume Gibson’s response to the ACORN break played a factor. I don’t pay enough attention to Katie to know what she did.
I’m always interested to see what things can change a person’s mind (hence the name of this blog), so I’m glad he mentioned it. It turns out that Saul Alinsky was right again. Alinksy, an alleged influence in Obama’s life, suggests showing an enemy in their true light so people can see what they really are.
The guy who made the ACORN tapes found success with that tactic. It looks like Gibson and Couric. All I can say is keep up the good work.
To appear “smart” this guy continues to qualify his position. He doesn’t believe there’s an organized conspiracy in media, but now he sees how individual biases, especially when a majority of people in the profession align idealogically, can influence the angles and the coverage. I haven’t heard any support the “organized media conspiracy” theory. That’s a straw man he’s set up for himself to knock.
All this reminds of a story from conservative journalists (some do exist). I’m not sure who this came from. This gentlemen was working late one night with one of his liberal editors when the topic of bias came up. The conservative journalist said that 90% of the staff were card carrying Democrats. He asked his editor if he could see why the stories were biased. The editor replied that journalists are trained to be objective and professional.
The conservative journalist then asked, “well, okay then, since journalists are trained to be objective and professional, how would you feel if 90% of the staff were card carrying Republicans?”
His editor replied, “That wouldn’t work. You can’t trust them to be objective.”
I think of that story every time I hear people defend bias in the media or pretend it doesn’t exist or pretend it only exists on Fox. It is hard to see our own biases.
But, I think people are starting to see their bias.